Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Debunking the Sun's Debunked Healthcare Myth

The Baltimore Sun Editorial Board believes that it has debunked a so-called “myth” about the health care bill:


There's a tantalizing rumor running through the Internet that the Democrats in Congress are conspiring to exempt themselves from the health care reform bills now being debated in Washington. It's caught life in talk boards and blogs among the substantial number of people who are terrified that the government is secretly trying to completely take over health care and deny necessary treatment to millions. The fact that it's not true doesn't seem to have made much of a dent in the hysteria, which is increasing in its fervor this month as representatives and senators fan across the country to talk about health care with citizens in town hall meetings, web chats and conference calls.The origin of this particular conspiracy theory appears to lie with Louisiana Republican Congressman John Fleming, a physician, who is sponsoring a resolution calling for all members of Congress to be required to participate in the public health insurance option, if one is included in the health reform bill. His widely quoted press release on the matter reads, "Under the current draft of the Democrat healthcare legislation, members of Congress are curiously exempt from the government-run health care option, keeping their existing health plans and services on Capitol Hill."

Trouble is, there's nothing curious at all about the fact that members of Congress wouldn't be required to sign up for the public health insurance plan. Nobody else would be, so why should they? But Mr. Fleming is fanning the notion that the health reform plan would somehow amount to socialized medicine á là Canada or England, despite explicit assurances from President Obama and the architects of the health reform proposals in Congress that people who like their health care now would be able to keep it under the reform plan.

That is technically true but that truth has a five-year half life. Read Section 102 pp 16-17 of HR 3200 and you will find that the bill sets up a five-year grace where you can indeed keep your healthcare. However, when that grace period expires, all plans must meet federally determined requirements, meaning that after five years your healthcare will change. And that means you won’t be able to keep the plan you have nor will you necessarily get a plan you like.

I would also like to introduce the Sun editorial writers to Jacob Hacker the Yale political science professor who devised the public option plan/strategy. Hacker openly admits that the public option is designed to put the country on the road to a single payer system. And I quote “It’s not a Trojan Horse. It’s right there. We’re gonna get there, over time, slowly, but we’ll move away from reliance on employer-based health insurance but we’ll do it in a way where we’re not going to frighten people into thinking they are going to lose their private insurance.” And “One of the virtues of it [the public option] though is that you can at least make the claim that there is a competitive system between the public and private sectors.”
So the popular concerns are well founded and the queries to their representatives whether they will forsake their lavish coverage for the government option is a valid concern. Why? Because The Lewin Group analyzed HR 3200 and found:
  • Approximately 103 million people would be covered under the new public plan and as a consequence about 83.4 million people would lose their private insurance. This would represent a 48.4 percent reduction in the number of people with private coverage.

  • About 88.1 million workers would see their current private, employer-sponsored health plan go away and would be shifted to the public plan.

  • Yearly premiums for the typical American with private coverage could go up by as much as $460 per privately insured person, as a result of increased cost shifting stemming from a public plan modeled on Medicare.

Like Hacker said “IT’S RIGHT THERE.” If only the Baltimore Sun editorialists had the eyes to see it.

4 comments:

mindmatter said...

Playing the devil's advocate; sorry.

Five years ago, I was a computer programmer, making lots of overtime, and had employer-provided health insurance. I developed carpal-tunnel syndrome in both hands (bilateral). Workman's Comp refused to treat me, blaming my type 1 diabetes, not my 25 years of typing. Fine; I have Kaiser insurance. Nope - they refused me, saying that it was work related! Workman's comp, in the state of California, is controlled by Kaiser - the state doctor was literally two doors down from my own doctor's office. I was taken off work, refused workman's comp and went on disability, and five years later, I'm still waiting for treatment. What again is the problem with a public option?

Today, at the age of 44, I'm blind in one eye and going blind in the other, my kidneys are failing, I can barely walk anymore, my BP is through the roof - all from five years with an untreated chronic condition. The result of being a worker with both worker's comp insurance and private health insurance. What again is the problem with the public option?

Today I'm alive only after a five year fight to get onto Medicare. I've received far more medical treatment in the last couple of months under socialized medicine than I ever got in five years under private insurance, absolutely saving my life. What again is the problem with the public option?

John

Mark Newgent said...

John,

You are covered through Medicare. Then why not play with reform in the giant sand box that is Medicare. Also, I don't think you will find much opposition on either side of the aisle to eliminating denial due to pre-exisiting conditions.

You don't need to a public option along with a lot of the other bad ideas in Obamacare to do either of those things.

mindmatter said...

Had there been a "public option" available to me, I would not have waited five years for treatment, I would be much healthier today, and I'd have been working the past four years instead of being a financial load upon my fellow Americans, something that causes me much shame, as I've worked all of my life until this crap befell be.

I could twist the data, and say that there's no apparent price issues or lack of competition in the package delivery business. But it's easy to counter this by comparing with the educational system, where the price is quite spread out. I don't want such nonsense-filled debate. I share with you some concern over big government involvement - I really do. But right now, the healthcare industry is operating unfettered, and it nearly cost me my life at one point. Not all are as strong as I. Please believe me - I do not want a socialist nation, and appreciate your diligent watchfulness. But this must change now! Once it hits close to home, opinions often change. Realize that I mean no disrespect for your concerns, I'm just desperate to see in my country what other countries seem to provide for their people. Affordable health coverage for all. We can do this, and need ideas for change, now.

John

mindmatter said...

btw, Mark:
I see that you're a conservative, running for office in a democratically held office. Let me say to you good luck, as regardless of party affiliation, I respect anyone who's willing to shake things up in this dead government that we have. I hope you make a difference, be it conservative or otherwise. I respect the man before the party, sir. Again; good luck to you.

John

ShareThis