Monday, June 29, 2009

Fighting Crime with Stupidity

You don't have to be paying too much attention to realize that you go to Arundel Mills these days at your own risk. Crime has become damn near commonplace at the sprawling mall complex that was (theoretically) designed to be a haven for tourists and for local commerce, not a magnet for criminal elements. Well, instead of doing something constructive to combat the crime wave that has overcome the mall, County Councilman Daryl Jones has decided to do something.....else:

Citing a recent robbery and the perception that Arundel Mills mall is unsafe, County Councilman Daryl Jones is considering introducing a bill that would require all malls to install security cameras in their parking lots.
Yeah, that is Jones' total solution to the Arundel Mills crimewave; security cameras at all malls in the county, much like a Baltimore County law I wrote about four years ago. To prove how completely asinine the Councilman's suggestion, chew on this nugget information:

Les Morris, a spokesman for Simon Malls, the parent company of Arundel Mills and Marley Station in Glen Burnie, declined to talk about how the legislation would affect the malls without seeing the specifics.

"We have an extensive (closed-circuit TV) network that covers the property, both inside and out," he said.

So Jones' solution to the crime problem at Arundel Mills is to require all county mall owners to have the same system that is not solving the problem at Arundel Mills. That's brilliant.

As usual, Democrats always try to enact "solutions" that deal with our crime problems in ways that are designed to make the public feel comfortable with their surroundings as opposed to actually dealing with the crime problem. Democrats love the idea of an ever expanding network of surveillance cameras that we have noted in the past will never stop one crime from being committed. Not one. You might get some cool footage of somebody being robbed (or worse) in the parking lot, but it will be the very definition of naivete to think that a street criminal is going to be deterred one bit by a camera (unless we are installing some sort of Transformers).

The prudent solution would be working with the Simon Company in increaisng police patrols and police presence in the are to arrest criminals......but who ever said Maryland Democrats wants to actually implement prudent solutions?

(Crossposted)

3 comments:

D. C. Russell said...

And do you suppose that Councilman Jones would agree that the best way to fight political corruption would be to install surveillance cameras in the offices of all elected officials, as well as in all places where elected officials meet with lobbyists or accept money from people trying to buy votes?

I'll start believing that government officials who push for speed, red light, security, or whatever cameras are sincere when they start agreeing to be on camera all the time themselves.

Duke hoops fan said...

I'd feel much better if we had more realistic "carry" regulations. Crime at Arundel Mills would decrease quickly after word got out about a couple of perps who messed with the wrong person.

Camers? No .357 magnum? Yes

Attiq Ur Rehman said...

I think this title are clearly shows the whole story posted in to the article. WI agree with the first commenter that the best way to fight political corruption would be to install surveillance cameras in the offices of all elected officials and other places as well.
anwalt

ShareThis