Bologna Boy still full of Bologna
David Paulson, of all people, has a column up at PolitickerMD.com regarding "political courage." Now, never mind the fact that "Maryland Democrat" and "political courage" tend to be oxymoronic, I want to highlight this comment, which highlights why Paulson doesn't get it:
It is easy to whine, gripe, attack and predict disaster is at the doorstep. Having the courage to solve real problems is hard and sometimes costly. After all, there is always someone or some group ready, willing and able to do what's easy.You're right David, it is easy to whine, gripe, attack and predict disaster. So why, David, do you instinctively defend Martin O'Malley at every turn? All the Governor does is whine about Governor Ehrlich, gripe about how hard his job is, attack anybody who even remotely opposes his bad ideas, and predicts disaster if the people of Maryland don't roll over for his whims, and right now.
And you're right David: having the courage to solve real problems is hard and sometimes costly. I just wish that Maryland Democrats had some of this courage that you speak of, because they sure as hell didn't show it during the General Assembly session. Instead of reducing the size of government and assuring the people of Maryland that our state was under prudent financial stewardship, they instead rubber stamped O'Malley's profligate spending, sticking the citizenry with a higher tax bill as a result. That's certainly not leadership, that is, in fact, doing what's easy. Maryland Democrats are good at that.
Paulson later goes on to say something even more patently absurd:
In the end they couldn't even agree with each other on the Smith Island Cake. Some belittled our new "state cake" as a complete waste of time for a General Assembly facing serious issues. They must have forgotten it was a Republican sponsored bill in the first place.Paulson forgets three key points:
- Just because something is sponsored by Republicans doesn't mean it's a good idea. There are a lot of ideas from the moderate wing that aren't exactly beneficial to our side, nor are any number of bills that Republicans sign-on to as co-sponsors at all representative of our ideology;
- Republicans actually have the testicular fortitude to call each other out when they go astray: Democrats outside of leadership have been for all intents and purposes been politically neutered in Maryland for some time now; and,
- The Smith Island Cake was not the issue for a lot of people; it was Page Elmore's sellout of his vote for O'Malley's profligate budget to get the Smith Island Cake bill passed that was the real key issue.
(Crossposted)
7 comments:
Brian, I am surprised that you forgot about the person who left the deficit before Ehrlich...Parris Glendening. Glendening left the state in bad financial shape, similar to the shape he left Prince George's County in when he ascended to Governor in 1994.
Of all the people who should know that it is easy to whine, gripe and attack...because they did it for four years under Ehrlich.
But with Ehrlich it was issues. issues that should have been discussed.
Or, does the right-wing demand no discussion - just one sided flame-throwing?
With Brian its silly cheap-shots he can't back up. He's writes flirebrand prose but he has no substantiation beyond the pre-crafted talking points - no facts and no context.
It's silly stuff.
Glendening did leave a deficit. Bob made it worse. I think the article addressed that and no one has disputed it.
Brian stayed away from that one about as far as he could run.
But Paulson's Stalinist cult-of- personality agitprop for O'Malley is the epitome of reasoned argument?
Going by Mr. Donna Hamitlon's logic, if Ehrlich should be castigated for not doing anything about the structural deficit then what O'Malley should be praised for perpetuating it as well?
While in Hawaii, he (John Leopold) served as the Director of Planned Parenthood Hawaii, and in his campaign for Governor of Hawaii in 1978 he noted that he supported “abortion for poor women” in an article for the Honolulu Advertiser.
OK, I'm not sure what John Leopold has to do with this. I mean, everything you write is 100% factual, but it relates to this.....how?
Anyway, back to the other anonymoust poster:
With Brian its silly cheap-shots he can't back up. He's writes flirebrand prose but he has no substantiation beyond the pre-crafted talking points - no facts and no context.
Seriously, that's the best you can do? You can't have it both ways. I can't be attacking my side for doing stupid stuff and "stick to the talking points" whilst you defend David Paulson for....sticking to the talking points.
So....grow up.
I have a couple of points, first addressing:
But with Ehrlich it was issues. Issues that should have been discussed. Or, does the right-wing demand no discussion - just one sided flame-throwing?
Ehrlich brought everyone to the table from across the state, not just the people who live in the Capital Region and Central Maryland. He also tried to talk to the Democrats, but it's hard to talk to a brick wall if you know what I mean. I have seen them sit at the table with Ehrlich and then go ahead and launch their own plans (the BGE disaster two years ago is prime case in point.)
Glendening did leave a deficit. Bob made it worse. I think the article addressed that and no one has disputed it.
I think BOTH sides should remember that no governor leaves it's successor a deficit because they can't, it's against the state constitution. Plus, it's a known fact that the last three governors, including this one, likes to spend money. The Examiner stated that Maryland does not have a budget crisis, but a spending problem.
Ehrlich handled his spending problem a lot better than Glendening and WAY better than O'Malley is doing now. Ehrlich was willing to do cuts, and I mean real cuts and not the window dressing that O'Malley was doing nearly a year ago at a Board of Public Works meeting.
Anyone who has ever heard Paulson rant and ramble on "Lanny Davis style" knows that his sycophancy knows no bounds. I take it for what it is ... cat box liner.
Post a Comment